=========
=========
Promoted from the journals by streiff. Promotion does not suggest recommendation.
=========
=========
A former long-term ex-boyfriend of Christine Blasey Ford provides some quite damning (and trustworthy) conflicting evidence. He opposes numerous key assertions made by Ford throughout her testament before the Senate Judiciary Committee. In a letter readily available on Scribd, this man, whose name has actually been redacted, declares he remained in a relationship from 1992 to 1998 with Ford.First, he stated that Ford when assisted her life long best buddy and roommate at the time , Monica L. McLean, to prepare for a polygraph test. McLean was
by district attorney Rachel Mitchell about the polygraph examination. Her childlike responses were regularly interrupted as she consulted her counsel.At 3:10 in the video: Mitchell: Have you ever had discussions with anyone, besides your lawyers, about how to take a polygraph?Ford:( lady scout like )Never.Mitchell: And I do not just suggest counter-measures, I indicate any sort of tips or anything
likethat?Ford: No, I was scared of the test itself
, however was comfy that I might tell the info and the test was going to reveal whatever it was going to expose.
I did n’t anticipate it to be as long as it was going to be, so it was a bit stressful.Mitchell: Have you ever offered tips or advice to somebody who was seeking to take a polygraph test?Ford: Never.Liar!The other essential inconsistent evidence concerns Ford’s worry of flying and of tight areas with only one exit. This man, who had a six-year relationship
withFord and even lived with
credit card they had actually shared. Later on, he discovered that Ford had charged$600 to the card. She rejected the charges initially, once he threatened to include fraud prevention, she admitted she had made the purchases.Finally, he says that Ford never informed him that she had actually been a victim of sexual attack, harassment or misconduct, nor did she ever mention Brett Kavanaugh.If this guy is found to be genuine, then this woman who “should be thought”will be shown to be a phony. Can you state perjury, Dr. Ford?The post Gotcha Dr. Ford!
Oh, and Speaking of Sen. Blumenthal’s”Falsus In Uno, Falsus In Omnibus”… appeared very first on RedState.
Source
https://www.redstate.com/diary/Elizabeth%20Vaughn/2018/10/03/gotcha-dr.-ford-much-sen.-blumenthals-falsus-uno-falsus-omnibus/