Latest Post

How to Improve B2B Blogging In the Era of Big Data | Online Sales Guide Tips How to Sleep Soundly with Intercostal Muscle Strain Ruby vs Python: What’s The Difference & How To Choose?

Promoted from the journals by streiff. Promotion does not suggest recommendation.

A former long-term ex-boyfriend of Christine Blasey Ford provides some quite damning (and trustworthy) conflicting evidence. He opposes numerous key assertions made by Ford throughout her testament before the Senate Judiciary Committee. In a letter readily available on Scribd, this man, whose name has actually been redacted, declares he remained in a relationship from 1992 to 1998 with Ford.First, he stated that Ford when assisted her life long best buddy and roommate at the time , Monica L. McLean, to prepare for a polygraph test. McLean was

requesting a position with either the FBI or an US Lawyer’s Office which needed the test. He composed: I witnessed Dr. Ford help McLean get ready for a prospective polygraph examination. Dr. Ford discussed what to anticipate, how polygraphs worked and assisted McLean become familiar and less anxious about the test. Dr. Ford was able to help due to the fact that of her background in psychology.Below is a clip of Ford being questioned

by district attorney Rachel Mitchell about the polygraph examination. Her childlike responses were regularly interrupted as she consulted her counsel.At 3:10 in the video: Mitchell: Have you ever had discussions with anyone, besides your lawyers, about how to take a polygraph?Ford:( lady scout like )Never.Mitchell: And I do not just suggest counter-measures, I indicate any sort of tips or anything

likethat?Ford: No, I was scared of the test itself

, however was comfy that I might tell the info and the test was going to reveal whatever it was going to expose.

I did n’t anticipate it to be as long as it was going to be, so it was a bit stressful.Mitchell: Have you ever offered tips or advice to somebody who was seeking to take a polygraph test?Ford: Never.Liar!The other essential inconsistent evidence concerns Ford’s worry of flying and of tight areas with only one exit. This man, who had a six-year relationship

withFord and even lived with

her for a part of that time, had no understanding of Ford’s worry of flying. He said they even flew on a little, inter-island prop airplane in Hawaii when and she made no reference of it.Dr. Ford < a href= > never suggested a worry of flying. To the very best of my recollection, Dr. Ford never expressed a worry of closed quarters, tight areas or places with just one exit. I helped Dr. Ford in finding a location to live in [redacted] CA. She ended up living in a really small, 500 sq. ft. home, with just one door.He ended the relationship because Dr. Ford had betrayed. He then removed her from a

credit card they had actually shared. Later on, he discovered that Ford had charged$600 to the card. She rejected the charges initially, once he threatened to include fraud prevention, she admitted she had made the purchases.Finally, he says that Ford never informed him that she had actually been a victim of sexual attack, harassment or misconduct, nor did she ever mention Brett Kavanaugh.If this guy is found to be genuine, then this woman who “should be thought”will be shown to be a phony. Can you state perjury, Dr. Ford?The post Gotcha Dr. Ford!

Oh, and Speaking of Sen. Blumenthal’s”Falsus In Uno, Falsus In Omnibus”… appeared very first on RedState.