Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Fantastic men are often bad men, even when they exercise influence and not authority.”
— Sir John Dalberg-Acton
In Part I of this series, we looked at the absolute incompetence that has defined the CDC given that its creation. Perhaps even worse is the prevalent corruption that exists within the firm. Government officials, pharmaceutical companies, and even the media have actually worked together to optimize their earnings and power at the cost of public health.
This has resulted in a world in which we can no longer rely on federal government leaders, CDC directors, or perhaps significant news outlets to provide us the truth. And when brave patriots have come forward to eliminate this corruption and injustice, they have actually been slandered, sued, and silenced. In Part II of our series, let’s take a look at the effect of this corruption.
The Vaccine Agenda and Expense Gates
The CDC, federal government officials, the pharmaceutical market, and the mainstream media are taking advantage of the coronavirus pandemic to enhance their ongoing agenda and get rid of any staying opposition that might remain in a position to combat back. Regrettably, the companies that are supposed to protect us have been utilized as pawns in the war on freedom by the elite.
You see, there has actually been an agenda for many years now to force vaccines, chemotherapy, and other pharmaceutical interventions on all citizens. These drugs produce profane quantities of profit. Mandating them would create a guaranteed consumer base of hundred of millions of Americans (and billions around the world).
This “pandemic” has currently created substantial new wealth for those who are already abundant in a manner that most of us can’t even comprehend. As over 40 million individuals declare unemployment due to jobs removed away by fascist political mandates, the world’s billionaires are growing. In fact, U.S. billionaires have increased their wealth by nearly 10%– to the tune of over $400 billion.
Amazon’s Jeff Bezos– already the wealthiest man on the planet– increased his wealth by more than $25 billion since the break out of COVID-19. Eric Yuan (CEO of Zoom), Steve Ballmer (Microsoft), and Elon Musk (Tesla) have all seen their fortunes grow by over $1 billion. Members of congress are being investigated for expert trading, accused of selling and purchasing stocks based on the coming financial collapse while guaranteeing the American people that whatever would be great.
Bill Gates (the second-richest male worldwide, behind Bezos) has been dealing with a different kind of financial investment: the WHO. Gates has actually been considered by numerous to be a champion in the medical field during this pandemic … regardless of the truth that he has definitely no medical training.
After building the Microsoft empire, the U.S. federal government convicted him of breaking antitrust laws in 1999. A year later, he founded the Expense and Melinda Gates Foundation, which essentially runs the WHO. (After the U.S. suspended funding to the WHO, Gates ended up being the WHO’s single largest donor.) The WHO has actually been a leader in spreading fear and false information and has adamantly pushed to fast-track a vaccine … even suggesting that we give up the already inadequate safety testing usually used for vaccine development.
How did Gates change from a power-hungry overlord who was sued by the federal government for breaking the law to a distinguished philanthropist and beacon of selflessness, intent on ridding the world of disease? He didn’t. When Gates could no longer broaden his empire, wealth, and power through the tech industry, he right away set his sights on a larger prize: control of global health policy.
The strategy is actually brilliant. To the inexperienced eye, it would appear that Gates is on an objective to help the world. However, through the Bill and Melinda Gates Structure, he has actually transformed the WHO into the automobile through which he can acquire even more power and control.
POTUS vs WHO
Among the couple of outsiders in the political arena is President Donald Trump, who has been fighting the WHO for a long time now. On April 7th, President Trump announced that he will suspend financing for the WHO pending an examination into the UN-connected company.
“The WHO … they called it wrong,” said President Trump in his April 7th Coronavirus briefing concerning the WHO’s inactions in the early months of COVID-19. “They missed the call. They must have called it months previously. They would have understood. They ought to have understood. And they probably did understand. So we will be checking out that extremely thoroughly, and we are going to put a hold on money invested to the WHO.”
The following week, Trump discussed more.
America and the world have chosen to rely on the WHO for accurate, timely, and independent details to make important public health recommendations and choices,” Trump said at an April 14, 2020 press conference. “If we can not rely on that this is what we will get from the WHO, our country will be forced to discover other ways to deal with other countries to attain public health goals.”
At a May 1, 2020 briefing, Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany clarified the administration’s stance towards both the WHO and China.
It is obvious that China mishandled the scenario,” stated McEnany. “Simply a few examples for you: they did not share the hereditary sequence until a teacher in Shanghai did so on his own the really next day. China closed down this lab for ‘rectification.’ They slow-walked information on human-to-human transmission together with the World Health Organization and did not let U.S. private investigators in at an extremely crucial time.”
Even media sources who are generally important of Trump admit that the WHO’s stance in line with China is investigation-worthy.
Institutions of international governance, like institutions of nationwide governance, are susceptible to a particular kind of corruption: they’re inclined to serve powerful interests at the cost of their mission,” wrote journalist Robert Wright in an April 10 article for Wired magazine.
You can check out more about the WHO corruption here.
The CDC: A History of Corruption
This corruption is thriving within U.S. borders. For too long, the CDC has had a relaxing relationship with business unique interests. The result? Bad policy and misinformation created to exploit the American individuals rather than protect them.
Back in 2016, a group calling themselves the CDC Researchers Maintaining Stability, Diligence and Principles in Research, or (CDC SPIDER), put a list of problems in composing into a letter to CDC Chief of Personnel and supplied a copy of this letter to the general public watchdog organization U.S. Right to Know (USRTK). The members of the group elected to file the problem anonymously for worry of retribution.
It appears that our objective is being influenced and shaped by outside parties and rogue interests … and Congressional intent for our company is being circumvented by a few of our leaders. What issues us most, is that it is becoming the norm and not the rare exception,” the letter states. “These questionable and unethical practices threaten to weaken our trustworthiness and track record as a trusted leader in public health.”
According to a short article in The Hill, the complaint cites (among other things) a “cover” of the bad efficiency of a females’s health program called the Well-Integrated Screening and Assessment for Woman Throughout the Country, or WISEWOMAN. The program supplies basic preventive services to assist 40-to 64-year-old ladies reduce their risks for heart illness and promote healthy lifestyles. CDC presently funds 21 WISEWOMAN programs through states and tribal organizations. The problem states there was a collaborated effort within the CDC to misrepresent information offered to Congress That it appeared that this program was involving more females than it really was.
Definitions were changed and information ‘prepared’ to make the outcomes look better than they were,” the problem states. “An ‘internal review’ that involved personnel across CDC occurred and its findings were essentially suppressed so the media and/or Congressional staff would not become aware of the problems.”
The letter mentions that Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro, a Democrat from Connecticut who has been an advocate of the program, has actually inquired to CDC concerning the information. A spokesperson for her workplace confirmed as much.
The complaint also alleges that staff resources that are expected to be dedicated to domestic programs for Americans are instead being directed to deal with global health and research study problems.
And the grievance points out as “unpleasant” the ties between soda giant Coca-Cola Co., an advocacy group backed by Coca-Cola, and two high-ranking CDC officials– Dr. Barbara Bowman, who directed the CDC’s Department for Heart problem and Stroke Avoidance up until retiring in June, and Dr. Michael Pratt, senior Advisor for Global Health in the National Center for Chronic Disease Avoidance and Health Promo (NCCDPHP) at the CDC.
Bowman retired after revelations of what the problem called an “irregular” relationship with Coca-Cola and a not-for-profit business interest group established by Coca-Cola called the International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI). Email interactions acquired through the Flexibility of Info Act (FOIA) requests by USRTK revealed that in her CDC function, Bowman had been communicating frequently with– and offering assistance to– a leading Coca-Cola supporter seeking to influence world health authorities on sugar and beverage policy matters.
E-mails likewise suggested that Pratt has a history of promoting and assisting lead research study moneyed by Coca-Cola while being employed by the CDC. E-mails gotten by FOIA showed that Pratt has also been working carefully with ILSI, which advocates for the program of beverage and food markets. Numerous research study papers co-written by Pratt were at least partially funded by Coca-Cola, and Pratt has actually gotten industry funding to participate in industry-sponsored events and conferences. Last month, Pratt took a position as Director of the University of California San Diego Institute for Public Health.
Coca-Cola has been pushing a program to get rid of sweet drinks like Coke from the weight problems discussion. Their theory goes that consumption of sugar-laden foods and beverages is not to blame for weight problems or other health issues, and a lack of exercise is the main culprit.
Specialists in the nutrition arena have actually said that these relationships are troubling because the objective of the CDC is to safeguard public health, and yet particular CDC authorities seem close with an industry that, studies say, is connected to about 180,000 deaths annually worldwide, consisting of 25,000 in the United States. The CDC is supposed to be attending to increasing obesity rates amongst children, not advancing drink market interests.
Bad Science
Now, the CDC is assaulting the President and using fear of the coronavirus to flex the American individuals into submission. Stress have grown because the President basically sideline the CDC after the company’s utter failure to lead the action to this brand-new virus.
The New York City Times obtained a copy of the CDC’s reopening guideline suggestions and described the President’s choice to reject it. The recommendations include utilizing non reusable meals and utensils at dining establishments, closing every other row of seats in buses and trains while limiting transit paths amongst areas experiencing various levels of coronavirus infection, and separating kids at school and camps into groups that ought to not mix throughout the day.
The White Home and other administration authorities turned down these suggestions over concerns that they were overly prescriptive, infringed on spiritual rights and ran the risk of even more harming an economy that has actually already been significantly crippled. One senior official at the Department of Health and Person Providers with deep ties to religious conservatives challenged any controls on church services.
“Governments have a duty to advise the public on how to remain safe throughout this crisis and can definitely do so without determining to individuals how they must praise God,” stated Roger Severino, the director of the Department of Health and Person Provider’ Workplace for Civil Liberty, who when oversaw the DeVos Center for Religion and Civil Society at the Heritage Foundation.
And that argument is now exposed. As the White House continues to dismiss CDC guidelines for reopening the nation, allegations have actually been made that the President doesn’t care about public health. That couldn’t be further from the truth. Many of the suggestions made and implemented have definitely no clinical basis.
We’re being forced to remain inside your home, even though suitable vitamin D levels are crucial for excellent health. Parks and beaches are inexplicably closed down, even as the research study reveals that this is making things even worse. A new publication from Dr. Eamon Laird and Teacher Rose Anne Kenny, School of Medication, and the Irish Longitudinal Research Study on Ageing (TILDA), in partnership with Teacher Jon Rhodes at University of Liverpool, highlights the association between vitamin D levels and mortality from COVID-19.
The authors of the short article, simply published in the Irish Medical Journal, evaluated all European adult population studies, completed because 1999, which measured vitamin D and compared vitamin D and death rates from COVID-19.
This research study shows that, counter intuitively, nations at lower latitudes and usually bright nations, such as Spain and Northern Italy, had low concentrations of vitamin D and high rates of vitamin D deficiency among the population. These nations also experienced the highest infection and death rates in Europe.
The northern latitude countries of Norway, Finland, and Sweden, have higher vitamin D levels regardless of less UVB sunlight exposure, because supplementation and fortification of foods is more common. These Nordic nations have lower COVID-19 infection and death rates. The connection in between low vitamin D levels and death from COVID-19 is statistically substantial.
The authors propose that, whereas enhancing vitamin D levels will definitely benefit bone and muscle health, the data suggests that it is also most likely to minimize serious COVID-19 problems. This may be due to the fact that vitamin D is very important in regulation and suppression of the inflammatory cytokine action, which triggers the serious repercussions of COVID-19 and the ‘acute respiratory distress syndrome’ which is related to ventilation and death.
Teacher Rose Anne Kenny stated: “In England, Scotland and Wales, public health bodies have revised suggestions given that the COVID-19 break out. Recommendations now mention that all adults must take a minimum of 400 IU vitamin D daily. Whereas there are currently no results from randomized regulated trials to conclusively show that vitamin D beneficially impacts COVID-19 results, there is strong inconclusive evidence of associations between vitamin D and the intensity of COVID-19 reactions, consisting of death.”
This study further verifies this association. We get in touch with the Irish government to update guidelines as a matter of urgency and motivate all adults to take supplements during the COVID-19 crisis. Deficiency is regular in Ireland. Shortage is most common with age, weight problems, in guys, in ethnic minorities, in individuals with diabetes, hypertension and in nursing homes.”
Dr. Eamon Laird added: “Here we see observational evidence of a link of vitamin D with death. Optimizing vitamin D intake to public health standards will certainly have advantages for total health and [will] assistance immune function. Research like this is still exploratory and we require additional trials to have concrete evidence on the level of vitamin D that is required for ideal immune function. Research studies like this also remind us how low our vitamin D status is in the population (even in bright countries) and adds additional weight to some sort of obligatory vitamin D stronghold policy. If the Nordic nations are enabled to do this, there is no factor Ireland, the UK or rest of Europe can’t either.”
We understand that the majority of cases of COVID-19 transmission happen in restricted spaces for extended durations of time; such as entire households separated in their homes for months without end. We also know that mask requireds make the issue even worse, not much better.
The models used to enforce these limitations have been proven to be absolutely wrong. According to The Daily Wire, The Imperial College London design from March revealed that as lots of as 2.2% of Americans could pass away from COVID-19.
The model was off– way off. And now experts say it was “totally unreliable.”
One computer system information modeling professional said the Imperial model coding, done by teacher Neil Ferguson, is a “buggy mess that looks more like a bowl of angel hair pasta than a finely tuned piece of programming,” the Daily Telegraph reported.
“In our industrial reality, we would fire anybody for establishing code like this and any organisation that depend on it to produce software application for sale would likely fail,” David Richards, co-founder of British data innovation business WANdisco, informed the Telegraph.
And that’s not the only issue. The economy and public health are usually intertwined. Here are a few of the truths emerging from the shutdown and quarantine:
The truth is that kids and the poor will be most seriously affected by our response to this infection. A lot more of them will die and experience the fallout than from the infection itself. It’s easy to accept the severe constraints that our federal governments have actually levied and scoff at those who dissent when you live a life of privilege, however the reality is that we are killing more people with our action than the virus ever could. More lives will be lost. The lifestyle will be reduced. Dreams and long-lasting financial investments will be damaged.
Stay tuned for Part III of this series, where we’ll take a difficult look at the leaders who are on the front lines in the battle for freedom.
